<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43361</link>
    <description>A show cause notice issued during a pending classification dispute was challenged on the ground that it disregarded an earlier HC order, while the Department had already filed an SLP in the Supreme Court without obtaining any stay. The Department stated that the notice was intended only to preserve its claim for a future contingency and gave an undertaking that no adjudication or levy would be pursued under the notice until the Supreme Court decided the SLP. In view of that undertaking and the absence of any stay of the earlier HC order, the Court found no further directions necessary and disposed of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:03:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 78 - HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43361</link>
      <description>A show cause notice issued during a pending classification dispute was challenged on the ground that it disregarded an earlier HC order, while the Department had already filed an SLP in the Supreme Court without obtaining any stay. The Department stated that the notice was intended only to preserve its claim for a future contingency and gave an undertaking that no adjudication or levy would be pursued under the notice until the Supreme Court decided the SLP. In view of that undertaking and the absence of any stay of the earlier HC order, the Court found no further directions necessary and disposed of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>