<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 77 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769805</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld provisional attachment of properties mortgaged to appellant banks in a money laundering case. The scheduled offence occurred from 2010-2017 with FIR registered in 2018. SBI sanctioned Rs. 8 Crore loans against two properties in 2015, while Axis Bank sanctioned Rs. 40 Crore against 14 properties. The tribunal noted potential collusion between bank officials and accused company directors required determination by Special Judge, PMLA Court. Banks as secured mortgagees may stake claims under sections 8(5)-8(8) of PMLA, 2002. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s provisional attachment order was confirmed based on reasonable belief from complaint allegations and recorded statements. Appeal disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 77 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769805</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA upheld provisional attachment of properties mortgaged to appellant banks in a money laundering case. The scheduled offence occurred from 2010-2017 with FIR registered in 2018. SBI sanctioned Rs. 8 Crore loans against two properties in 2015, while Axis Bank sanctioned Rs. 40 Crore against 14 properties. The tribunal noted potential collusion between bank officials and accused company directors required determination by Special Judge, PMLA Court. Banks as secured mortgagees may stake claims under sections 8(5)-8(8) of PMLA, 2002. The Adjudicating Authority&#039;s provisional attachment order was confirmed based on reasonable belief from complaint allegations and recorded statements. Appeal disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>