https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806 The Tribunal noted that, for seizure, attachment and confiscation, the scheme of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 prevails over the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It further held that an inter se dispute on whether confiscation should operate in favour of the State Government or the Central Government did not invalidate confirmation of attachment, particularly where the record showed conviction in the predicate offence and the properties were treated as proceeds of crime arising from criminal misconduct. On that basis, the challenge to the attachment confirmation was held not maintainable and the impugned orders were upheld. en-us Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806 The Tribunal noted that, for seizure, attachment and confiscation, the scheme of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 prevails over the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. It further held that an inter se dispute on whether confiscation should operate in favour of the State Government or the Central Government did not invalidate confirmation of attachment, particularly where the record showed conviction in the predicate offence and the properties were treated as proceeds of crime arising from criminal misconduct. On that basis, the challenge to the attachment confirmation was held not maintainable and the impugned orders were upheld. Case-Laws Money Laundering Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806