<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 78 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806</link>
    <description>AT ruled on PMLA attachment validity, affirming ED&#039;s power to attach properties already seized by State Police. The tribunal held PMLA provisions override Cr.P.C. for property attachment, confirmed attachment of disproportionate assets against convicted public servants, and allowed ED to challenge State&#039;s prior confiscation order. Appeals were dismissed, preserving attachment while permitting judicial resolution of inter-agency disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 78 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA AT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806</link>
      <description>AT ruled on PMLA attachment validity, affirming ED&#039;s power to attach properties already seized by State Police. The tribunal held PMLA provisions override Cr.P.C. for property attachment, confirmed attachment of disproportionate assets against convicted public servants, and allowed ED to challenge State&#039;s prior confiscation order. Appeals were dismissed, preserving attachment while permitting judicial resolution of inter-agency disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>