<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 89 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769817</link>
    <description>In a prosecution involving recovery of commercial quantity of narcotic contraband, the Delhi High Court applied the mandatory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and required satisfaction of the twin conditions for bail: reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and that the accused is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. The Court noted that the record prima facie showed service of notice, consent, medical examination, and recovery-related compliance, and treated alleged defects in search, seizure, sampling, or other procedural steps as insufficient to override Section 37. Regular bail was declined.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 89 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769817</link>
      <description>In a prosecution involving recovery of commercial quantity of narcotic contraband, the Delhi High Court applied the mandatory bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act and required satisfaction of the twin conditions for bail: reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and that the accused is unlikely to commit an offence while on bail. The Court noted that the record prima facie showed service of notice, consent, medical examination, and recovery-related compliance, and treated alleged defects in search, seizure, sampling, or other procedural steps as insufficient to override Section 37. Regular bail was declined.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>