<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 90 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769818</link>
    <description>HC reviewed a petition challenging pre-deposit conditions for appeal. Despite arguments about the condition being onerous, the Court upheld statutory requirements. Relying on SC precedent, it emphasized that Article 226 discretionary powers should not circumvent mandatory statutory provisions. The review petition was dismissed, maintaining the original order&#039;s conditions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 90 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769818</link>
      <description>HC reviewed a petition challenging pre-deposit conditions for appeal. Despite arguments about the condition being onerous, the Court upheld statutory requirements. Relying on SC precedent, it emphasized that Article 226 discretionary powers should not circumvent mandatory statutory provisions. The review petition was dismissed, maintaining the original order&#039;s conditions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>