<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769830</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Tribunal addressed the validity of an addition under Section 69A during demonetization. Based on a detailed cash flow statement and accepted bank withdrawals, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 10,00,000 addition. The ruling emphasized that when cash book entries are reliable and cash sources are adequately explained, unexplained cash credit additions are unwarranted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, rejecting the revenue department&#039;s challenge to the cash deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 102 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769830</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Tribunal addressed the validity of an addition under Section 69A during demonetization. Based on a detailed cash flow statement and accepted bank withdrawals, the Tribunal deleted the Rs. 10,00,000 addition. The ruling emphasized that when cash book entries are reliable and cash sources are adequately explained, unexplained cash credit additions are unwarranted. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, rejecting the revenue department&#039;s challenge to the cash deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>