<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769831</link>
    <description>SC allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging income tax addition for SBN deposits during demonetization. Despite 112-day delay in appeal filing, the Tribunal condoned it on medical grounds. On merits, the Tribunal found no evidence of unexplained funds and directed deletion of Rs. 4,83,500/- addition, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 103 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769831</link>
      <description>SC allowed taxpayer&#039;s appeal challenging income tax addition for SBN deposits during demonetization. Despite 112-day delay in appeal filing, the Tribunal condoned it on medical grounds. On merits, the Tribunal found no evidence of unexplained funds and directed deletion of Rs. 4,83,500/- addition, setting aside lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>