<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 104 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769832</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT (Exemption), finding procedural defects in the original registration denial. The key ruling emphasized principles of natural justice, requiring the assessee be granted adequate opportunity for personal hearing and document submission under Sections 80G and 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The original orders were set aside, directing fresh consideration with full procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 104 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769832</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal remanded the case back to the CIT (Exemption), finding procedural defects in the original registration denial. The key ruling emphasized principles of natural justice, requiring the assessee be granted adequate opportunity for personal hearing and document submission under Sections 80G and 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The original orders were set aside, directing fresh consideration with full procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769832</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>