<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 108 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769836</link>
    <description>ITAT Lucknow held that commission income earned by Cane Development Councils and Cooperative Cane Development Unions from sugar mills constitutes business receipts, not income from other sources. The commission relates to their statutory role in sugarcane production and marketing under the UP Sugarcane Act, 1953, rather than investment activities. Therefore, such income qualifies for deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 108 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769836</link>
      <description>ITAT Lucknow held that commission income earned by Cane Development Councils and Cooperative Cane Development Unions from sugar mills constitutes business receipts, not income from other sources. The commission relates to their statutory role in sugarcane production and marketing under the UP Sugarcane Act, 1953, rather than investment activities. Therefore, such income qualifies for deduction under section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s decision and dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>