<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 109 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769837</link>
    <description>The SC/Tribunal set aside penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act where income addition was based solely on estimated net profit rates. The appellate authorities progressively reduced the profit rate from 12% to 6%, indicating lack of concrete evidence of income concealment. Since the income assessment was fundamentally estimation-based, the penalty was not justified and the impugned order was consequently overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 109 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769837</link>
      <description>The SC/Tribunal set aside penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act where income addition was based solely on estimated net profit rates. The appellate authorities progressively reduced the profit rate from 12% to 6%, indicating lack of concrete evidence of income concealment. Since the income assessment was fundamentally estimation-based, the penalty was not justified and the impugned order was consequently overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>