<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769842</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai held that interest income need not be accrued when debtor was declared NPA and underwent insolvency proceedings, as there was no realistic probability of realization. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 3.6 crore interest income, noting tax should be levied on real income, not hypothetical income. However, ITAT denied TDS credit claim, ruling that without declaring corresponding income, assessee cannot claim TDS credit, following Bombay HC precedent in Imageads &amp;amp; Communications case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 114 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769842</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai held that interest income need not be accrued when debtor was declared NPA and underwent insolvency proceedings, as there was no realistic probability of realization. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of Rs. 3.6 crore interest income, noting tax should be levied on real income, not hypothetical income. However, ITAT denied TDS credit claim, ruling that without declaring corresponding income, assessee cannot claim TDS credit, following Bombay HC precedent in Imageads &amp;amp; Communications case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769842</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>