<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769850</link>
    <description>Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the 37% surcharge improperly levied on tax liability. With total income of Rs. 3,48,040/- (below Rs. 5 crore threshold), no surcharge was legally leviable. The Central Processing Centre erroneously applied maximum surcharge rate, violating statutory provisions. Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to Finance Act, 2022 surcharge slabs and procedural fairness under section 143(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 14:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 122 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769850</link>
      <description>Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the 37% surcharge improperly levied on tax liability. With total income of Rs. 3,48,040/- (below Rs. 5 crore threshold), no surcharge was legally leviable. The Central Processing Centre erroneously applied maximum surcharge rate, violating statutory provisions. Tribunal emphasized strict adherence to Finance Act, 2022 surcharge slabs and procedural fairness under section 143(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>