<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 131 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769859</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the HC&#039;s decision upholding the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the assessee&#039;s revision claim under section 263 and exemption under section 54F. HC had found the PCIT lacked jurisdiction because both conditions for invoking section 263 - that the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - were not satisfied. No interference was warranted under Article 136; the SLP and pending applications are dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2025 11:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 131 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769859</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition challenging the HC&#039;s decision upholding the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the assessee&#039;s revision claim under section 263 and exemption under section 54F. HC had found the PCIT lacked jurisdiction because both conditions for invoking section 263 - that the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to revenue - were not satisfied. No interference was warranted under Article 136; the SLP and pending applications are dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>