<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 132 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769860</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax determination order. The court found improper service of notices by uploading solely in portal&#039;s &quot;additional notices/orders&quot; tab. Held that such upload does not constitute valid service. Directed appellate authority to consider appeal on merits within three months, treating appeal as timely filed, thereby ensuring due process for taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 132 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769860</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging tax determination order. The court found improper service of notices by uploading solely in portal&#039;s &quot;additional notices/orders&quot; tab. Held that such upload does not constitute valid service. Directed appellate authority to consider appeal on merits within three months, treating appeal as timely filed, thereby ensuring due process for taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>