<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769867</link>
    <description>The SC partially allowed the writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders. The court remanded the matter to the appellate authority, directing it to permit the petitioner (a railway wagon parts supplier) to submit additional documents for Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims. The decision aligns with a recent SC judgment mandating comprehensive documentary evidence for ITC verification, requiring the appellate authority to reconsider the claims within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 May 2025 08:54:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 139 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769867</link>
      <description>The SC partially allowed the writ petitions challenging GST assessment orders. The court remanded the matter to the appellate authority, directing it to permit the petitioner (a railway wagon parts supplier) to submit additional documents for Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims. The decision aligns with a recent SC judgment mandating comprehensive documentary evidence for ITC verification, requiring the appellate authority to reconsider the claims within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>