https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43353 The High Court held that it did not have jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain writ petitions challenging customs adjudication orders, emphasizing the need for a reasonable nexus to its jurisdiction. The court clarified that the mere presence of a branch office in a particular location does not confer jurisdiction on the local High Court. Referring to relevant case law and the territorial aspects of the case, the court dismissed the writ petitions, advising the petitioner to seek remedy from the High Courts in Bombay or Gujarat instead of Madras. en-us Thu, 05 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:48:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43353 The High Court held that it did not have jurisdiction under Article 226 to entertain writ petitions challenging customs adjudication orders, emphasizing the need for a reasonable nexus to its jurisdiction. The court clarified that the mere presence of a branch office in a particular location does not confer jurisdiction on the local High Court. Referring to relevant case law and the territorial aspects of the case, the court dismissed the writ petitions, advising the petitioner to seek remedy from the High Courts in Bombay or Gujarat instead of Madras. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 05 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43353