<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 147 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769875</link>
    <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax demand order. Court found show cause notice valid, petitioner failed to respond timely, and alternative statutory appeal remedy existed. The delay in uploading demand on portal did not invalidate the original order. Petitioner&#039;s rectification application under Section 161 was rejected as non-maintainable, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818812" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 147 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769875</link>
      <description>HC dismissed writ petition challenging tax demand order. Court found show cause notice valid, petitioner failed to respond timely, and alternative statutory appeal remedy existed. The delay in uploading demand on portal did not invalidate the original order. Petitioner&#039;s rectification application under Section 161 was rejected as non-maintainable, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural requirements in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769875</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>