<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 44 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769772</link>
    <description>The NCLT New Delhi rejected a Section 9 application under IBC for initiation of CIRP against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the claimed debt did not qualify as &quot;operational debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Code as it failed to meet prerequisite conditions. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute existed between the operational creditor and corporate debtor regarding product quality prior to the demand notice under Section 8, which barred admission of the application. The petition was rejected for non-compliance with statutory requirements and due to the disputed nature of the debt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 16:28:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 44 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769772</link>
      <description>The NCLT New Delhi rejected a Section 9 application under IBC for initiation of CIRP against the corporate debtor. The tribunal held that the claimed debt did not qualify as &quot;operational debt&quot; under Section 5(21) of the Code as it failed to meet prerequisite conditions. Additionally, a pre-existing dispute existed between the operational creditor and corporate debtor regarding product quality prior to the demand notice under Section 8, which barred admission of the application. The petition was rejected for non-compliance with statutory requirements and due to the disputed nature of the debt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>