<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings on the non-entry of 603 scooters in the RG-1 register and the surrounding production records were treated as essentially factual. The High Court held that the suggested challenge did not disclose any independent question of law under Section 35G of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The argument that the matter involved only a technical violation was not accepted as a basis for reference. No referable question of law arose, and the application was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 72 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s findings on the non-entry of 603 scooters in the RG-1 register and the surrounding production records were treated as essentially factual. The High Court held that the suggested challenge did not disclose any independent question of law under Section 35G of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The argument that the matter involved only a technical violation was not accepted as a basis for reference. No referable question of law arose, and the application was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>