<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 5 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769733</link>
    <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed deduction of expenditure incurred on abandoned project. Assessee was compelled to abandon expansion project due to reasons beyond control and wrote off expenses from &#039;work in progress&#039; as they would not create usable assets. Tribunal held that abandonment was a commercial decision and tax authorities cannot question wisdom of such decisions. Amount written off was allowable as deduction. AO directed to delete disallowance made under sections 143(1) and 143(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 5 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769733</link>
      <description>ITAT Mumbai allowed deduction of expenditure incurred on abandoned project. Assessee was compelled to abandon expansion project due to reasons beyond control and wrote off expenses from &#039;work in progress&#039; as they would not create usable assets. Tribunal held that abandonment was a commercial decision and tax authorities cannot question wisdom of such decisions. Amount written off was allowable as deduction. AO directed to delete disallowance made under sections 143(1) and 143(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>