<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 23 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769751</link>
    <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding deduction under Section 80G. The tribunal held that when a donee institution directly orders equipment from suppliers, with delivery and installation at the donee&#039;s premises while the assessee only finances the acquisition, it constitutes cash donation rather than donation in kind. The assessee merely recorded the donation in books without recording any purchase, supporting the cash donation characterization. Following a coordinate bench&#039;s earlier decision and HC precedent, the tribunal distinguished this from donation in kind cases. The penalty issue became academic following the favorable quantum appeal decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 23 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769751</link>
      <description>ITAT Jaipur allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal regarding deduction under Section 80G. The tribunal held that when a donee institution directly orders equipment from suppliers, with delivery and installation at the donee&#039;s premises while the assessee only finances the acquisition, it constitutes cash donation rather than donation in kind. The assessee merely recorded the donation in books without recording any purchase, supporting the cash donation characterization. Following a coordinate bench&#039;s earlier decision and HC precedent, the tribunal distinguished this from donation in kind cases. The penalty issue became academic following the favorable quantum appeal decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769751</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>