<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769753</link>
    <description>ITAT Delhi held that cash deposits made during demonetization period cannot be taxed under Section 69A/115BBE when properly recorded in books of account with explained sources. Following Chennai Bench precedent in PCIT v. M.C. Hospital, the tribunal ruled that recorded book entries cannot be brought to tax under Section 69A. Since the assessee maintained proper records of cash deposits, sales, purchases, and stock transactions, the addition was deleted. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 25 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769753</link>
      <description>ITAT Delhi held that cash deposits made during demonetization period cannot be taxed under Section 69A/115BBE when properly recorded in books of account with explained sources. Following Chennai Bench precedent in PCIT v. M.C. Hospital, the tribunal ruled that recorded book entries cannot be brought to tax under Section 69A. Since the assessee maintained proper records of cash deposits, sales, purchases, and stock transactions, the addition was deleted. Appeal decided in favor of assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>