<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 26 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769754</link>
    <description>ITAT Surat held that assessee successfully explained source of cash deposits during demonetization period through maintained books of accounts showing sufficient cash in hand from earlier bank withdrawals. AO&#039;s addition under section 68 was deleted as source was adequately explained and no defects were found in books. However, regarding interest expenditure disallowance, tribunal held 25% should be disallowed as not wholly for business purposes, directing addition of Rs. 4,81,558. Appeal partly allowed against revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 26 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769754</link>
      <description>ITAT Surat held that assessee successfully explained source of cash deposits during demonetization period through maintained books of accounts showing sufficient cash in hand from earlier bank withdrawals. AO&#039;s addition under section 68 was deleted as source was adequately explained and no defects were found in books. However, regarding interest expenditure disallowance, tribunal held 25% should be disallowed as not wholly for business purposes, directing addition of Rs. 4,81,558. Appeal partly allowed against revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>