https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769765 HC held the civil court's jurisdiction was not ousted by ss. 269-UN or 293 of the IT Act where the plaintiff sought a declaration of automatic abrogation and revesting of property by operation of law. The HC set aside the Single Judge's dismissal, answered Issue No.1 against the Revenue and restored the suit for trial, expedited due to its vintage. The court declined to decide other issues, revived the prior interim order until disposal, directed no order as to costs, and restored the matter to the trial calendar. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Sep 2025 11:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769765 HC held the civil court's jurisdiction was not ousted by ss. 269-UN or 293 of the IT Act where the plaintiff sought a declaration of automatic abrogation and revesting of property by operation of law. The HC set aside the Single Judge's dismissal, answered Issue No.1 against the Revenue and restored the suit for trial, expedited due to its vintage. The court declined to decide other issues, revived the prior interim order until disposal, directed no order as to costs, and restored the matter to the trial calendar. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769765