https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769766 HC ruled that AO failed to properly consider objections to assessment reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act. The court found the AO's order superficial, lacking substantive reasoning, and not compliant with Supreme Court precedents. HC set aside the impugned order, directing AO to reconsider objections with a reasoned order within four weeks, and providing the petitioner time to seek judicial review if needed. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769766 HC ruled that AO failed to properly consider objections to assessment reopening under Section 148 of Income Tax Act. The court found the AO's order superficial, lacking substantive reasoning, and not compliant with Supreme Court precedents. HC set aside the impugned order, directing AO to reconsider objections with a reasoned order within four weeks, and providing the petitioner time to seek judicial review if needed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769766