https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769767 Anticipatory bail was considered in a case alleging a coordinated bogus-firm and fake input tax credit fraud involving forged documents, invoices and e-way bills. The court treated the allegations as a serious economic offence with prima facie involvement in forgery and cheating, not a mere tax dispute, and found custodial interrogation necessary to trace financial channels, electronic evidence and the wider conspiracy. A co-accused's regular bail did not create parity because the applicant's alleged role was distinct and more serious. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was declined. en-us Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769767 Anticipatory bail was considered in a case alleging a coordinated bogus-firm and fake input tax credit fraud involving forged documents, invoices and e-way bills. The court treated the allegations as a serious economic offence with prima facie involvement in forgery and cheating, not a mere tax dispute, and found custodial interrogation necessary to trace financial channels, electronic evidence and the wider conspiracy. A co-accused's regular bail did not create parity because the applicant's alleged role was distinct and more serious. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was declined. Case-Laws GST Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769767