<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (5) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769770</link>
    <description>The HC examined a GST Act case involving procedural irregularities in a tax demand order. The Court found multiple statutory violations: (1) the demand exceeded the show cause notice amount, (2) the order lacked substantive reasoning, and (3) the petitioner was not effectively notified. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and directed the tax authority to provide a fair hearing and issue a reasoned order within legal parameters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 08:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (5) TMI 42 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769770</link>
      <description>The HC examined a GST Act case involving procedural irregularities in a tax demand order. The Court found multiple statutory violations: (1) the demand exceeded the show cause notice amount, (2) the order lacked substantive reasoning, and (3) the petitioner was not effectively notified. Consequently, the HC quashed the impugned orders and directed the tax authority to provide a fair hearing and issue a reasoned order within legal parameters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>