https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43325 A contested supplier's money claim arising from alleged tax-related liability under the Sale of Goods Act was treated as a matter better left for civil adjudication, and the writ court declined to decide the merits of the demand or underlying liability. That substantive question was left open for determination in appropriate proceedings. To prevent disruption of supply pending such adjudication, the court granted only limited protective relief restraining discontinuance of supply merely because the demanded amount had not been paid until final decision in the suit. en-us Mon, 05 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:31:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43325 A contested supplier's money claim arising from alleged tax-related liability under the Sale of Goods Act was treated as a matter better left for civil adjudication, and the writ court declined to decide the merits of the demand or underlying liability. That substantive question was left open for determination in appropriate proceedings. To prevent disruption of supply pending such adjudication, the court granted only limited protective relief restraining discontinuance of supply merely because the demanded amount had not been paid until final decision in the suit. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 05 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43325