<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1446 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461816</link>
    <description>The SC examined the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act. The Tribunal modified the AO&#039;s addition on a different ground, applying a gross profit rate. The SC held that since the addition was confirmed on grounds other than concealment of income, penalty was not leviable. The pendency of a substantial question of law before HC further supported deletion of penalty. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the penalty of Rs. 9,18,673/- being set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 17:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1446 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461816</link>
      <description>The SC examined the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act. The Tribunal modified the AO&#039;s addition on a different ground, applying a gross profit rate. The SC held that since the addition was confirmed on grounds other than concealment of income, penalty was not leviable. The pendency of a substantial question of law before HC further supported deletion of penalty. The assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed, with the penalty of Rs. 9,18,673/- being set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>