<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (8) TMI 1927 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461819</link>
    <description>Cash deposit additions are sustained where the assessee fails to prove the source of the deposit or establish the identity, creditworthiness and financial capacity of the alleged provider. The explanation was not substantiated before the assessment authority, the first appellate authority or the Tribunal, so the addition was upheld against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 19:03:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818521" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (8) TMI 1927 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461819</link>
      <description>Cash deposit additions are sustained where the assessee fails to prove the source of the deposit or establish the identity, creditworthiness and financial capacity of the alleged provider. The explanation was not substantiated before the assessment authority, the first appellate authority or the Tribunal, so the addition was upheld against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461819</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>