https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43321 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal and a recall application before the appellate authority were available. The Court treated the power to recall an order for sufficient cause, including inability to appear for reasons beyond control, as ancillary to the authority's functions, but noted that no such application had been made. In these circumstances, the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the available appellate and recall remedies. en-us Tue, 17 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:11:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43321 Writ jurisdiction was declined because an effective statutory appeal and a recall application before the appellate authority were available. The Court treated the power to recall an order for sufficient cause, including inability to appear for reasons beyond control, as ancillary to the authority's functions, but noted that no such application had been made. In these circumstances, the writ petition was not entertained and the petitioner was left to pursue the available appellate and recall remedies. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 17 Oct 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43321