<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 726 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461808</link>
    <description>HC discharged the show-cause notice against Respondents alleging contempt of an interim status quo order. The Court found that the alleged attempt to fix an electricity meter did not constitute a material breach of the order. The tentative possession finding in the interim order was not conclusive, and the act did not warrant contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act or Constitutional provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 12:37:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 726 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461808</link>
      <description>HC discharged the show-cause notice against Respondents alleging contempt of an interim status quo order. The Court found that the alleged attempt to fix an electricity meter did not constitute a material breach of the order. The tentative possession finding in the interim order was not conclusive, and the act did not warrant contempt proceedings under the Contempt of Courts Act or Constitutional provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>