<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1602 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769688</link>
    <description>In proceedings under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the Court held that arrest under Section 19 was not illegal because the grounds of arrest were communicated in writing contemporaneously, acknowledged by the arrestee, and placed before the remand court without objection. On bail, the Court found prima facie material linking the petitioner to the property transaction, cash flows, and use of group infrastructure, and applied the statutory presumption and twin conditions under Section 45. As reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner was not guilty were not established, custody alone did not justify release, and bail was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1602 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769688</link>
      <description>In proceedings under the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002, the Court held that arrest under Section 19 was not illegal because the grounds of arrest were communicated in writing contemporaneously, acknowledged by the arrestee, and placed before the remand court without objection. On bail, the Court found prima facie material linking the petitioner to the property transaction, cash flows, and use of group infrastructure, and applied the statutory presumption and twin conditions under Section 45. As reasonable grounds to believe the petitioner was not guilty were not established, custody alone did not justify release, and bail was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769688</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>