<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1626 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769712</link>
    <description>Section 9(1)(vii) is construed narrowly: fees for technical services cover only consideration for managerial, technical or consultancy services, not a mere facility. On that footing, commission income under a commissionaire arrangement was held not to be fees for technical services because it involved no material change in facts or law from an earlier year&#039;s position. Subscription receipts for access to journals, databases and content were also held outside the definition because standardised access to published material is not a specialised or customised service. The Revenue&#039;s appeals failed and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1626 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769712</link>
      <description>Section 9(1)(vii) is construed narrowly: fees for technical services cover only consideration for managerial, technical or consultancy services, not a mere facility. On that footing, commission income under a commissionaire arrangement was held not to be fees for technical services because it involved no material change in facts or law from an earlier year&#039;s position. Subscription receipts for access to journals, databases and content were also held outside the definition because standardised access to published material is not a specialised or customised service. The Revenue&#039;s appeals failed and no substantial question of law arose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>