<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769720</link>
    <description>HC ruled that tax authorities (DGGI) must provide complete, unredacted Relied Upon Documents (RUDs) to Petitioners within one week, ensuring fair hearing principles. The court mandated 30 days for Petitioners to file reply after receiving full documents, followed by personal hearing. Partial document disclosure was deemed insufficient, violating natural justice, and the Department was directed to ensure procedural compliance in the GST proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:38:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1634 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769720</link>
      <description>HC ruled that tax authorities (DGGI) must provide complete, unredacted Relied Upon Documents (RUDs) to Petitioners within one week, ensuring fair hearing principles. The court mandated 30 days for Petitioners to file reply after receiving full documents, followed by personal hearing. Partial document disclosure was deemed insufficient, violating natural justice, and the Department was directed to ensure procedural compliance in the GST proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>