<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1638 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769724</link>
    <description>The SC upheld GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six continuous months. Despite missed appeal timelines, the Court allowed potential restoration if the petitioner submits all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest, and late fees within two months. The ruling emphasizes statutory compliance and provides a remedial pathway for registration restoration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818288" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1638 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769724</link>
      <description>The SC upheld GST registration cancellation under Section 29(2)(c) for non-filing of returns for six continuous months. Despite missed appeal timelines, the Court allowed potential restoration if the petitioner submits all pending returns and pays tax dues, interest, and late fees within two months. The ruling emphasizes statutory compliance and provides a remedial pathway for registration restoration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769724</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>