<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1585 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769671</link>
    <description>HC quashed GST assessment orders for violating natural justice principles. The court found that notices uploaded solely on the GST portal without physical service were insufficient, denying the taxpayer proper hearing. All impugned orders were set aside, with directions for fresh consideration, requiring respondent to issue a 14-day notice and provide personal hearing within 30 days of receiving the taxpayer&#039;s reply. No interim monetary relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:37:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818279" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1585 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769671</link>
      <description>HC quashed GST assessment orders for violating natural justice principles. The court found that notices uploaded solely on the GST portal without physical service were insufficient, denying the taxpayer proper hearing. All impugned orders were set aside, with directions for fresh consideration, requiring respondent to issue a 14-day notice and provide personal hearing within 30 days of receiving the taxpayer&#039;s reply. No interim monetary relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>