<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1582 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769668</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a matter involving allegations of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and allied acts. The Court treated the accusations of document manipulation, false vouchers and dishonest misappropriation as serious, and held that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the alleged forgery and related conduct. On that basis, the petitioners were not granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2025 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1582 - JHARKHAND HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769668</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was refused in a matter involving allegations of forgery, cheating, criminal breach of trust and allied acts. The Court treated the accusations of document manipulation, false vouchers and dishonest misappropriation as serious, and held that custodial interrogation was necessary to investigate the alleged forgery and related conduct. On that basis, the petitioners were not granted the privilege of anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>