<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (2) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43291</link>
    <description>Accrued credit earned under a money credit scheme could not be extinguished by later rescission of the notification, because the underlying rules continued to protect utilisation of credit validly earned during the scheme&#039;s currency. The High Court held that such credit was a vested right once earned and remained available for use even after withdrawal of the scheme. However, the rescinding notification could operate prospectively, so no further credit could accrue after the scheme was withdrawn. The petitioner was therefore entitled to utilise credit earned before the cut-off date, but not to claim continuation of the scheme for future accrual.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:40:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=81820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (2) TMI 97 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43291</link>
      <description>Accrued credit earned under a money credit scheme could not be extinguished by later rescission of the notification, because the underlying rules continued to protect utilisation of credit validly earned during the scheme&#039;s currency. The High Court held that such credit was a vested right once earned and remained available for use even after withdrawal of the scheme. However, the rescinding notification could operate prospectively, so no further credit could accrue after the scheme was withdrawn. The petitioner was therefore entitled to utilise credit earned before the cut-off date, but not to claim continuation of the scheme for future accrual.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=43291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>