<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>US again puts India on &#039;priority watch list&#039; for alleged IP rights&#039; violations</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42311</link>
    <description>The document identifies inconsistent progress in intellectual property protection and enforcement by a major economy, citing ambiguous interpretation of patentability standards, discretionary use of patent revocation mechanisms, long patent prosecution delays, and onerous reporting requirements. It notes procedural improvements at the IP Office but finds overall enforcement inadequate and highlights trade-policy measures-such as high customs duties on IP-intensive goods-as complicating the IP regime and market access. Continued engagement through trade policy forums is proposed to address these systemic IP governance and enforcement concerns.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:16:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818142" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>US again puts India on &#039;priority watch list&#039; for alleged IP rights&#039; violations</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42311</link>
      <description>The document identifies inconsistent progress in intellectual property protection and enforcement by a major economy, citing ambiguous interpretation of patentability standards, discretionary use of patent revocation mechanisms, long patent prosecution delays, and onerous reporting requirements. It notes procedural improvements at the IP Office but finds overall enforcement inadequate and highlights trade-policy measures-such as high customs duties on IP-intensive goods-as complicating the IP regime and market access. Continued engagement through trade policy forums is proposed to address these systemic IP governance and enforcement concerns.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:16:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>