https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42284 The court tasked the prosecution to address whether use or carriage of non lethal smoke canisters falls within the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act definition of a terrorist act, given allegations that accused released coloured or yellow gas from canisters around parliamentary proceedings; prosecution asserts planning and intent to disrupt and revive prior attack fears, while defence denies explosives or applicability of UAPA, and the trial court had earlier refused bail on a prima facie assessment. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:31:04 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:31:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42284 The court tasked the prosecution to address whether use or carriage of non lethal smoke canisters falls within the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act definition of a terrorist act, given allegations that accused released coloured or yellow gas from canisters around parliamentary proceedings; prosecution asserts planning and intent to disrupt and revive prior attack fears, while defence denies explosives or applicability of UAPA, and the trial court had earlier refused bail on a prima facie assessment. News - Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:31:04 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42284