<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Concept of &quot;under protest&quot;</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119943</link>
    <description>The GST law contains no express procedure for payment under protest; payments via Form DRC-03 are treated as voluntary admissions or as amounts ascertained by the proper officer, and repeal-and-saving provisions do not import the prior statutory mechanism. Nevertheless, where payment is shown to be coerced or involuntary and accompanied by contemporaneous written protest, courts may recognise the protestary principle to support refund or restitution claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:18:10 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:37:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Concept of &quot;under protest&quot;</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119943</link>
      <description>The GST law contains no express procedure for payment under protest; payments via Form DRC-03 are treated as voluntary admissions or as amounts ascertained by the proper officer, and repeal-and-saving provisions do not import the prior statutory mechanism. Nevertheless, where payment is shown to be coerced or involuntary and accompanied by contemporaneous written protest, courts may recognise the protestary principle to support refund or restitution claims.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 09:18:10 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=119943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>