<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal&#039;s Discretionary Power Under Section 19(1) Upheld: Penalty Reduction Validated Without Judicial Interference</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87847</link>
    <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary power in reducing pre-deposit penalty to 20% under Section 19(1)&#039;s second proviso. The court affirmed that when legislative discretion is granted to an authority, its exercise depends solely on the authority&#039;s satisfaction and opinion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed procedurally correct, balancing potential undue hardship against penalty realization. The HC concluded that appellate forums cannot scrutinize the merits of the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary decision, thus declining to intervene in the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818048" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal&#039;s Discretionary Power Under Section 19(1) Upheld: Penalty Reduction Validated Without Judicial Interference</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87847</link>
      <description>HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary power in reducing pre-deposit penalty to 20% under Section 19(1)&#039;s second proviso. The court affirmed that when legislative discretion is granted to an authority, its exercise depends solely on the authority&#039;s satisfaction and opinion. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was deemed procedurally correct, balancing potential undue hardship against penalty realization. The HC concluded that appellate forums cannot scrutinize the merits of the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary decision, thus declining to intervene in the original order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=87847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>