<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1526 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769612</link>
    <description>A public servant cannot be prosecuted solely for criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC where sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been expressly declined and no independent substantive IPC offence is alleged. The stated conspiracy must be examined against its object: if it is confined to demand of illegal gratification forming the basis of a corruption offence under the Act, the prosecution cannot bypass the statutory bar by recasting the matter as conspiracy. Section 19 is a substantive safeguard, and an indirect attempt to achieve by IPC prosecution what the Act prohibits directly is legally unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1526 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769612</link>
      <description>A public servant cannot be prosecuted solely for criminal conspiracy under Section 120-B IPC where sanction for prosecution under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 has been expressly declined and no independent substantive IPC offence is alleged. The stated conspiracy must be examined against its object: if it is confined to demand of illegal gratification forming the basis of a corruption offence under the Act, the prosecution cannot bypass the statutory bar by recasting the matter as conspiracy. Section 19 is a substantive safeguard, and an indirect attempt to achieve by IPC prosecution what the Act prohibits directly is legally unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>