https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769628 Calcutta HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to eviction notice issued under Section 8(4) of PMLA and Rule 5(2) of Rules. Court held the notice was valid statutory consequence of Adjudicating Authority's order confirming provisional attachment. HC found non-compliance with Rule 5(1) doesn't vitiate Rule 5(2) notice, and absence of mandatory time limit makes delay irrelevant. Court deemed challenge premature given pending appeal before Appellate Tribunal, directing tribunal to expeditiously dispose appeal and stay application within two months. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769628 Calcutta HC dismissed petitioner's challenge to eviction notice issued under Section 8(4) of PMLA and Rule 5(2) of Rules. Court held the notice was valid statutory consequence of Adjudicating Authority's order confirming provisional attachment. HC found non-compliance with Rule 5(1) doesn't vitiate Rule 5(2) notice, and absence of mandatory time limit makes delay irrelevant. Court deemed challenge premature given pending appeal before Appellate Tribunal, directing tribunal to expeditiously dispose appeal and stay application within two months. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769628