<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1549 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769635</link>
    <description>HC ruled that the gold kada seized from the traveler was a personal effect under Baggage Rules, 2016, and its detention was unlawful. The court found the customs department&#039;s actions violated procedural requirements, including failure to issue a proper Show Cause Notice and provide personal hearing. The gold kada must be released within four weeks upon payment of warehouse charges, emphasizing protection of individual rights and adherence to legal procedures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1549 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769635</link>
      <description>HC ruled that the gold kada seized from the traveler was a personal effect under Baggage Rules, 2016, and its detention was unlawful. The court found the customs department&#039;s actions violated procedural requirements, including failure to issue a proper Show Cause Notice and provide personal hearing. The gold kada must be released within four weeks upon payment of warehouse charges, emphasizing protection of individual rights and adherence to legal procedures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769635</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>