<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1551 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769637</link>
    <description>Gauhati HC dismissed a writ petition challenging customs authorities&#039; show cause notice for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Petitioner alleged procedural violations including denial of cross-examination rights and seizure under duress. Court held that while Article 226(2) permits HC to exercise jurisdiction when cause of action arises within territory, petitioner&#039;s allegations of procedural lapses by customs authorities had no connection to petitioner&#039;s business location in Assam. The procedural violations claimed were unrelated to territorial nexus required for jurisdiction. Petition closed for want of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818016" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1551 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769637</link>
      <description>Gauhati HC dismissed a writ petition challenging customs authorities&#039; show cause notice for lack of territorial jurisdiction. Petitioner alleged procedural violations including denial of cross-examination rights and seizure under duress. Court held that while Article 226(2) permits HC to exercise jurisdiction when cause of action arises within territory, petitioner&#039;s allegations of procedural lapses by customs authorities had no connection to petitioner&#039;s business location in Assam. The procedural violations claimed were unrelated to territorial nexus required for jurisdiction. Petition closed for want of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>