<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 1559 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769645</link>
    <description>The SC/ITAT addressed a tax dispute involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal applied a consistent 0.2% gross profit rate based on its prior decision for an identical assessment year, reducing the original addition from Rs. 3,53,418/- to Rs. 53,957/-. By following its previous binding precedent, the Tribunal granted partial relief to the assessee and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, emphasizing procedural consistency in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=818008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 1559 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769645</link>
      <description>The SC/ITAT addressed a tax dispute involving alleged bogus purchases. The Tribunal applied a consistent 0.2% gross profit rate based on its prior decision for an identical assessment year, reducing the original addition from Rs. 3,53,418/- to Rs. 53,957/-. By following its previous binding precedent, the Tribunal granted partial relief to the assessee and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s order, emphasizing procedural consistency in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=769645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>