<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>CBI opposes in HC Chidambarams&#039; plea to defer framing of charges in INX media case</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42244</link>
    <description>The central investigative agency argues that framing of charges may go forward even while further investigation continues, opposing a request to defer pre-charge proceedings as not maintainable; the accused contend that deferral is necessary to protect the right to fair trial because the chargesheet is incomplete and access to investigative material remains restricted, potentially withholding exculpatory evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:31:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>CBI opposes in HC Chidambarams&#039; plea to defer framing of charges in INX media case</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42244</link>
      <description>The central investigative agency argues that framing of charges may go forward even while further investigation continues, opposing a request to defer pre-charge proceedings as not maintainable; the accused contend that deferral is necessary to protect the right to fair trial because the chargesheet is incomplete and access to investigative material remains restricted, potentially withholding exculpatory evidence.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:31:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=42244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>