<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1463 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461774</link>
    <description>Client accounts must be settled within the prescribed intervals and client funds and securities must remain segregated in compliance with the governing circular. Delays caused by software or depository issues did not excuse repeated non-compliance over several quarters, so the violation was established. Client funds may be withdrawn only for permitted client-related payments and identified purposes; using such funds to meet debit balances and other liabilities amounted to misuse. The circular drew no distinction for internal balances of group entities, associates or related persons, and a later circular was treated as a clarification of the earlier position. The regulatory breaches were upheld and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2025 19:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=817965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1463 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461774</link>
      <description>Client accounts must be settled within the prescribed intervals and client funds and securities must remain segregated in compliance with the governing circular. Delays caused by software or depository issues did not excuse repeated non-compliance over several quarters, so the violation was established. Client funds may be withdrawn only for permitted client-related payments and identified purposes; using such funds to meet debit balances and other liabilities amounted to misuse. The circular drew no distinction for internal balances of group entities, associates or related persons, and a later circular was treated as a clarification of the earlier position. The regulatory breaches were upheld and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=461774</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>